
Federal poll prompts fresh grants scrutiny
Posted on 06 Mar 2025
With a federal election around the corner, grant watchers will be keeping a close eye on potential…
Posted on 06 Mar 2025
By Matthew Schulz, journalist, SmartyGrants
The need for grantmakers to use impact measurement so they can improve their programs, confusion about the level of “proof” needed for proper evaluation, and the difficulties in getting honest answers from grantees who are eager to please are among the biggest challenges facing funders, according to SmartyGrants chief impact officer Jen Riley.
Riley, who led the rollout of the Outcomes Engine system within SmartyGrants, said her work with SmartyGrants users, funders and grantseekers highlighted some of the barriers to effective impact measurement and evaluation.
SmartyGrants and Learning and Evaluation for Australian Funders (LEAF) – a network of philanthropic and other funding evaluation specialists – will host an all-day Grant Impact Forum on June 4 in Melbourne to examine these difficult issues.
One key issue the forum will examine is how funders can use the impact intelligence they gather in a timely way.
Riley said most grantmakers launched new grant rounds before they had had time to absorb lessons from the previous ones.
“Generally, the impact measurement reports come in as much as two months after the next grant has already opened for applications, so how as a grant community should we deal with this?” she said.
Riley said the mismatch in the timing represented a significant “system issue” and resulted in a continual “loss of learning”.
Riley said another major challenge was determining the appropriate level of evidence for impact measurement and evaluation.
“What’s enough data?” Riley asked.
Grantmakers were seeking the “sweet spot” to avoid wasted time, wasted effort, wasted funds, and overburdening grantees. This was complicated by calls by federal government for greater use of randomised control trials (RCTs), which are widely considered the “gold standard” of evidence.
Another major challenge for funders was encouraging grant recipients to provide honest assessments.
“How do you how build a trusting environment where grantees will tell you what's really going on, rather than them telling you that everything's going great?” Riley asked.
“There’s no point generating data that is full of bias.”
“This is not about passive listening or endless slides. We’re asking people to be part of the conversation and part of the solution.”
Australia’s leading evaluators and impact measurement practitioners will present at the Grant Impact Forum, which will be limited to 100 participants and focused on “actionable insights” and problem solving.
“We’ve made this a face-to-face event because we want to help people to make a real difference in the way they evaluate and measure impact,” Riley said.
“This is not about passive listening or endless slides. We’re asking people to be part of the conversation and part of the solution.”
She said the forum came at a crucial time for funders under growing pressure to demonstrate their effectiveness. The event will feature practical strategies, case studies, and a chance to connect with grantmakers, funders and evaluation experts.
“Grantmakers are being asked about the impact of their investments, and about how the money is flowing into communities. This is about learning what works, so we can continue to ensure money being spent is making a difference.”
Speakers will include:
The event represents the first partnership between SmartyGrants and the LEAF network, which has more than 100 members across the country. LEAF is part of Philanthropy Australia, and funded by the Paul Ramsay Foundation. The network is guided by program director Liz Branigan, who is working to build the evaluation capacity of philanthropic organisations.
Riley said connecting LEAF and SmartyGrants users made sense.
Branigan said participants could expect practical insights into navigating a complex environment.
“This workshop will start where the others end – with the hard conversations about implementation challenges and barriers,” Branigan said.
She said participants could expect to gain “immediate shifts in their practice” from the forum.
“Measurement, evaluation and learning (known as MEL) is becoming core to grantmaking and people really want to know how to do this well.”
She said the LEAF network’s focus was using evaluation “for learning and transformation” and building better relationships between funders, grantees, partners, and the communities they serve.
Ticket prices range from $400 to $600, depending on grant program size.
Posted on 06 Mar 2025
With a federal election around the corner, grant watchers will be keeping a close eye on potential…
Posted on 06 Mar 2025
Australia’s biggest philanthropic foundation has committed $2.1 million to improving outcomes…
Posted on 06 Mar 2025
A grants fund targeting local government and not-for-profit groups to boost regional and rural…
Posted on 06 Mar 2025
The federal government has launched a long-awaited “grants engagement framework” and commitments to…
Posted on 06 Mar 2025
The need for grantmakers to use impact measurement so they can improve their programs, confusion…
Posted on 05 Mar 2025
Signing on a £1 million (AU$1.93 million) grants program celebrating maritime histories around the…
Posted on 05 Mar 2025
Adam Ognall, executive director of partnerships and practice at Philanthropy Australia, considers…
Posted on 05 Mar 2025
Government tax reforms affecting community foundations are expected to significantly boost…
Posted on 04 Mar 2025
Australia is facing the largest transfer of intergenerational wealth in its history.
Posted on 25 Feb 2025
If American entrepreneur, author and fundraising legend Dan Pallotta was Australian, he would most…
Posted on 19 Feb 2025
Charities Minister Andrew Leigh writes about the Labor government's agenda in 2025, including plans…
Posted on 19 Feb 2025
Leading funders say major social and political issues will shape the giving landscape in 2025.